Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button

Mitt Romney for 2012 President Race

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney officially became the second major Republican to be the GOP nominee in the 2012 presidential race in June 2011. To achieve his aim of winning White House bid, Mitt Romney is trying his best to show off her talented ability, knowledge and good minds. The 2012 presidential candidate announced a challenge to President Barack Obama in 2012 with his declaration that he would “put America back on a course of greatness.” Moreover, his announcement focused mainly on the troubled American economy and said he had “become convinced that America has been put on a dangerous course by Washington politicians, and it has become even worse during the last two years.”

Romney who was born in Michigan in 1947 is the son of George W. Romney, the former Governor of Michigan and Lenore Romney. He was ever a student of Brigham Young University. Romney joined the management consulting business, helping him reach a position at Bain & Company, eventually serving as its CEO to lead it out of crisis. Mitt Romney married his wife, Ann Romney in 1969 after years of dating out. The couple first met in elementary school when Mitt was a Cub Scout. Ann was riding a horse and Mitt Romney threw stones at her. They have a large family with five children: Taggart, Matthew, Joshua, Benjamin and Craig.

The former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has been a GOP nominee in the 2012 presidential campaign 

 

Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney blamed the U.S. government’s credit downgrade squarely on President Obama on Monday August 8. According to Mitt Romney, downgrade by ratings agency Standard & Poor’s, which has sparked a sharp drop in global financial markets, “punctuated once again the failure of leadership by the president.”

Mitt Romney governor declared: “Barack Obama has failed America.”

Mitt Romney spoke on Thursday August 11 in Iowa: ‘Corporations Are People’ as hecklers asked for raising taxes on large businesses

Ahead of his expected 2012 presidential bid, Mitt Romney has tried to appear more like an everyday guy rather than 2012 presidential candidate in skinny jeans

Ann Romney, Mitt Romney’s wife

Mitt Romney with his wife announced his bid for the US presidency at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan

Mitt Romney with his wife Ann prompted his bid for the Republican presidential nomination in Stratham

The Romney couple in New Hampshire

Romney’s happy family

First son Tagg Romney and Governor Mitt Romney at their lake house on April 15, 2007 to celebrate Ann Romney’s 58th birthday

 

Mitt Romney for the 2012 President Race

 

Related links:

Mitt Romney Suspends Bid for President

The 2012 GOP Presidential Race Has Begun

Rick Perry for President Running 2012

A New Era of Hope: Numerology for the Presidential Race 2008

Right now I am looking at the sticker I have on my desk that I kept from Election Day. I’m saving it to commemorate this historic event. On this sticker, it says, “I voted today 11.4.08″. I am looking at these numbers and marveling at the incredible story they tell us about this epic presidential race.

These numbers, 11, 4 and 8 are playing out over and over again in this saga and speak of the fateful nature of our new era. Looking at what they reveal, you can rest assured this will be a time of dramatic (if not turbulent) change, as well as prosperity, stability, unity and diplomacy.

Every story has its heroes. So let us begin by looking at the two main characters in this tale, Barack Obama and John McCain, who both boldly battled for their place as the 44th President of the United States.

To make it easier for you to follow this story, I will give you some guidelines for “reducing” numbers. In numerology, we work with the primary numbers 1-9 and add compound numbers together until they are reduced to a single digit. For example, the year 2008 is reduced by adding 2+0+0+8. This equals 10. We further reduce this number by adding 1+0, which equals 1. Got it? The only numbers that we do not reduce further are the master numbers 11 and 22, though there are other master numbers, 33 and 44, which we will explore later on.

The winner of this race, Barack Obama, has a birth date of August 4, 1961. He has an 11 lifepath and is currently in a personal year of 4. Look at his numbers closely – he was born on an 8 month, 4 day, in an 8 year, (1+9+6+1=17, 1+7=8). It was recently revealed that his birth time is 7:24pm. If we add these numbers, 7+2+4, we get 13 – reduced further, that’s another 4!

The numbers 4 and 8 are magnetically attracted to one another and will often show up during “fateful” events. These numbers show prominently in many transformative events in American history, including the day America declared independence from the British, the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation, and the day of this last election! In many ways, with so many 4′s and 8′s in Obama’s chart, he was destined for a leadership role, as 4 and 8 indicate executive abilities of great magnitude.

So, why did numerologists not predict this win earlier? Take a look at John McCain’s numbers here, and you will see why they were also strongly matched to the role of President during the current election cycle.

John McCain, who is in an 11 personal year right now, has a birth date of 8-29-1936. He was born on an 8 month, 11 day (2+9=11) in a 1 year. He too has a lifepath number of 11! Whenever you are in a personal year that is the same as your lifepath number, you can experience tremendous personal gain.

Remember, 11 is a master number. Those who have an 11 lifepath, as do both McCain and Obama, are born to be leaders. 11 is a highly psychic and intuitive number, and those who carry this vibration are often known as visionaries, bringing bold new ideas to the masses, with the light and wisdom to bring transformation to others. Imagine my amazement when Barack Obama was declared the President-elect at exactly 11pm! These synchronicities are no accident.

Our new President will be inaugurated in 2009. 2009 is an 11 year. This is the President who will take us to the end of the Mayan calendar, which ends on December 21, 2012. Amazingly, adding the numbers of this date, we get another 11!

So what do all of these 11′s mean?

There are four master numbers, 11, 22, 33, and 44. These are special numbers of leadership and foresight that are not given to anyone who is not capable of inspiring others and serving humanity. As the name implies, these numbers require mastery and skill, while presenting great opportunities and great challenges.

Of the master numbers, 11 is probably the most recognized. How often do you look at the clock at 11:11 and make a wish? That is because 11 is known as the instant manifestation number. Just look at it’s shape; the 1 is shaped like an antenna, a direct conduit between the divine and matter. With the double 1′s, the intensity is exponential. The double columns of this number 11 can be viewed as the pillars of the soul – offering an opportunity for a new way of being, based on an inspired vision of the future. For those courageous enough to walk on higher ground, the rewards are immeasurable.

This election has often been called one of “hope versus fear”. Another way to look at it is “unity” rather than “division”. Looking at the shape of this number, 11 can illustrate two individuals standing in their truth in perfect balance and unity. OR, it can represent division – two parties standing firmly in their beliefs without compromise.

In the past, McCain and Obama have both captured the potential of their 11 lifepath vibration and used their courage and insight to inspire others. However during their recent campaigns, they each chose a different way of directing their energy, and that inevitably determined the outcome of this election and subsequently the direction of our country.

The Obama campaign is viewed as one of the most successful in U.S. history. What made it so extraordinary was the synergy created between the positive vision of a motivating leader and the impassioned response of a vast cross-section of our society. It was an endeavor built with the love, sweat, and coordinated efforts of an aggregate of people energized by the aspiration of a better world.

This reveals the lesson of the two campaigns and the moral of this story. When we focus on a positive vision of our future rather than our fears, we can work together to overcome any obstacle. Heaven knows there are a great many more obstacles yet to come, and heaven is helping us too.

Right now, we are experiencing an astrological phenomenon that hasn’t transpired since the mid 1960s. The planet Saturn is opposing Uranus, and on November 4th, 2008 they were exactly 180 degrees in opposition for the first time in over 40 years. Saturn is the planet of order, discipline, tradition and fear, governing virtually every single structure in our life as well as our world. Uranus is a humanitarian planet that breaks down old, outdated structures and releases us from our limitations, creating sudden and dramatic changes. These two planets are currently engaged in a celestial battle and will be duking it out periodically until the summer of 2010. The last time this transit occurred was between the years 1965-1967, and the world has not looked the same since.

Currently, our traditional structures (Saturn) are falling apart. Uranus promises we can create new innovative structures, building beyond the boundaries of what we ever thought was possible. We have an exciting future ahead of us.

On January 20, 2009, we will inaugurate the 44th President of the United States. 44 is a master number often referred to as “the Atlas”. It is a number that shoulders heavy responsibilities. Those who carry it must contribute to the world in a substantial, material way, by building structures that serve humanity.

It is important to remember that we all carry these responsibilities on our collective shoulders. Now is a pivotal time in the creation of our global future. We can no longer look upon one another with fear and division. The only way we can develop healthy structures is by cooperating with one another and viewing our fellow earth travelers with love and compassion – no matter what our differences. This is how we transform individual fates into our common destiny.

I remember hearing the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. for the first time when I was a little girl in my elementary school in the Bronx. As I listened to the scratchy LP, his words were seared into my heart, my mind, and my soul. I listened to that recording over and over again, and his dream became my dream. His words became my hope and forever shaped how I viewed the world. I too believe that “one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.’”

So I remind you, during these times of tumultuous change, when our foundations are crumbling beneath us, and revolutionary ideas are taking shape, to hold a vision of humanity living in harmony with one another and Mother Earth. I do believe that one day the dreams of Martin Luther King Jr. will come to pass; that we will truly live in peace with the realization that we are all one; we are all connected. We have a long road ahead of us with many twists and turns. And we can do it. Yes we can. It is inevitable.

Al Franken Wins Senate Race

JUDGES: Franken winner of Senate race

Read the ruling
MUST WATCH: One-on-one with Coleman

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) – A Minnesota court confirmed Monday that Democrat Al Franken won the most votes in his 2008 Senate race against Republican Norm Coleman.

The ruling isn’t expected to be the final word because Coleman immediately announced plans to appeal to the state Supreme Court. He has 10 days to do so. That appeal could mean weeks more delay in seating Minnesota’s second senator.

“It’s time that Minnesota like every other state have two” senators, a jovial Franken said outside his Minneapolis town home with his wife, Franni, at his side. “I would call on Senator Coleman to allow me to get to work for the people of Minnesota as soon as possible.”

After a statewide recount and seven-week trial, Franken stands 312 votes ahead. Franken actually gained more votes from the election challenge than Coleman, the candidate who brought it.

The state law Coleman sued under merely required three judges to determine who got the most votes and is therefore entitled to an election certificate. That critical certificate is on hold pending appeal, and GOP Gov. Tim Pawlenty has hedged when asked if he’ll deliver it after the state courts are done reviewing the case.

“The overwhelming weight of the evidence indicates that the November 4, 2008 election was conducted fairly, impartially, and accurately,” the judges wrote in their unanimous opinion. “There is no evidence of a systematic problem of disenfranchisement in the state’s election system, including in its absentee-balloting procedures.”

In its order, the judicial panel dismissed two attempts by Coleman to subtract votes from Franken’s column over allegations of mishandled ballots in Minneapolis.

The judges rejected Coleman’s argument that a state board improperly made up for a packet of ballots lost between the election.

His lawyers conceded that the ballots – believed to be 132 – once existed but said their disappearance rendered them invalid. Coleman said he was entitled to review all ballots as part of the recount.

Coleman’s allegation of double-counting involved dozens of ballots that were duplicated because they couldn’t be fed into optical scanning machines on Election Day. His lawyers said the original and duplicated ballots lacked proper markings and it’s possible both version were tallied during the recount.

More Franken votes were at stake in both areas.

Coleman’s campaign lawyer Ben Ginsberg said an appeal was certain.

“The court’s ruling tonight is consistent with how they’ve ruled throughout this case but inconsistent with the Minnesota tradition of enfranchising voters,” Ginsberg said, adding in a written statement that he believes 4,400 unopened absentee ballots should count. “For these reasons, we must appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court so that no voter is left behind.”

But Rick Hasen, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, called it “a careful, unanimous opinion” that is “unlikely to be disturbed on appeal” by either the Minnesota Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court.

“The opinion considers the major arguments made by Coleman and rejects them in a detailed and measured way,” said Hasen, who runs an election law blog.

Taken as a whole, the ruling diminishes Coleman’s chances of retaining a seat he won in dramatic fashion in 2002. That year, he narrowly defeated former Vice President Walter Mondale, who stepped forward when Democratic incumbent Paul Wellstone died in a plane crash with two weeks to go in the campaign.

Franken, who made his name as a “Saturday Night Live” performer in the 1980s, entered the Senate race more than two years ago. The former liberal talk radio host and author outlasted other Democrats vying for the seat. He overcame several stumbles to catch Coleman in the race’s final weeks.

A third-party candidate’s strong showing left Coleman and Franken virtually deadlocked on Election Night, triggering an automatic recount of 2.9 million ballots. Coleman actually led by about 700 votes before routine double-checking of figures by local officials trimmed his edge to 215 votes heading into the hand recount.

Franken pulled ahead of Coleman in late December, and by the recount’s end in early January he was up by 225 votes. Days after Coleman’s single term expired, the former senator sued over the recount.

The trial gobbled up much of January, February and March. An appeal could push the race into May or beyond.

While Coleman has 10 days to file his Minnesota Supreme Court petition, he’ll have more time to make supplemental filings with the high court. It’s possible for Coleman to initiate a new action in federal court, too.

Coleman’s lawyers have said their appeal will mostly center on violations of the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. They say some counties treated absentee ballots differently, some rigorously checking to make sure voters met all legal requirements and others allowing more flexibility in applying the state standard.

Ginsberg said the trial court made things worse by requiring the campaigns to prove voters strictly abided by the law before the panel would count a previously rejected absentee ballot.

Franken’s attorneys argued that no election is absolutely precise and that all counties operated under the same standard.

A key question for the high court is what tolerance for error is acceptable. The three-judge panel gave its take, saying that local officials used “reasonable discretion to address election issues unique to their jurisdictions while still operating under the uniform standards of Minnesota law.”

Either side can appeal an eventual state Supreme Court decision to the U.S. Supreme Court or throw the disputed election before the U.S. Senate, which can judge the qualifications of its members.

The trial court judges – Hennepin County’s Denise Reilly, Pennington County’s Kurt Marben and Stearns County’s Elizabeth Hayden – were assigned to the case by the Supreme Court. But they became judges, respectively, under governors from the Republican Party, the Independence Party and the Democratic Party.