Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button

Ron Paul’s Support Moving to the Streets

It was not long ago that the majority of scientific polls did not even include Ron Paul as a possible candidate for the Republican nomination. That was because he had little support. His views on Iraq were different from every other Republican candidate and the general consensus was that he was not welcome in the Republican party.

But things have changed in recent months after a couple of national televised Republican debates put Ron Paul to the forefront. His message started to gain traction all over the Internet and that was just the beginning. He started getting included in all of the polls and jumped to as high as 3% in a few New Hampshire polls.

His second quarter fund raising was impressive and put more money in his bank than the one time Republican front runner John McCain. Ron Paul does not traditionally take in PAC money or have expensive fund raising dinners like the other candidates so that shows the gravity of the strength of his campaign.

Ron Paul is a fiscal conservative and spends money appropriately.

He does not spend money on fancy haircuts like John Edwards. He does not need to pay for online bloggers because he already has a base of support that is doing that for free. Ron Paul is in a great position to start getting his message out to the people.

The latest familiarity poll in New Hampshire was taken just 2-3 months ago and showed Ron Paul as being unknown to 74% of Americans. Those that see him and support him are very motivated for him. His poll number should continue to grow.

You’ve Been Ron Pauled

The 2008 election cycle has been responsible for many a memorable and insightful turn of phrase. We have, among others, the classic “Yes we can.” We don’t know what we can (do), but it does translate fluidly into Spanish. Perhaps what we can do is change. I’m not sure, but my favorite neologism has to be “You’ve been Ron Pauled.”

You’ve probably not heard these words before, especially as two of them, Ron and Paul together, have been censored by the media in this, our land of the free. I think fear plays into it somewhat. We don’t know what the object of this fear might be, but perhaps Ron Paul doesn’t translate well into double talk. At any rate, the best definition of “You’ve been Ron Pauled” that I’ve read is as follows: you’ve been Ron Pauled when someone more knowledgeable than you shows you to be the ignorant fool that you are. This is usually accomplished by using your own words against you.

A rough translation would be, “Well he showed you!”

We have seen many examples of hapless victims being Ron Pauled.

I’m sure it happens everyday, and, I’ll admit, it’s happened to me more than once. To be sure, some are more memorable than others. We have, for example, the good and honorable, sagacious senator John McCain being Ron Pauled at the republican debates just recently. When asked about the president’s working group on financial markets, Johnny fumbled and stumbled, made a face, bumbled and gave us his best impression of Miss South Carolina. Johnny had been Ron Pauled.

Others who have been Ron Pauled include “Fed” chairman Ben Bernanke. Truth be told, Benny is Ron Pauled on a routine basis, especially when questioned by Dr. Paul on the inept and incompetent policies of the federal reserve, the private cabal of bankers solely responsible for inflation, i.e., the ever-increasing prices you’re paying for food and gasoline and a roof over your head.

Luxuries, in other words.

The list of those who have been Ron Pauled is long and distinguished. Among the most clueless include George Bush on the war in Iraq; Barry Hussein Obama on the character of his friends; Hillary Clinton on the fidelity of her spouse; Johnny McCain on, well, just about everything; and George Bush on the economy.

Hey. Ron Paul – why isn’t this guy president?

Mitt Romney – Will He Be the First Mormon President?

Republican presidential candidate Willard Mitt Romney was born on March 12, 1947. He was named for his father’s best friend, hotel businessman J. Willard Marriott and Milton “Mitt” Romney, a relative who played football for the Chicago Bears. His father, George W. Romney, was a former Michigan governor, Housing and Urban Development Secretary, American Motors chairman and presidential candidate. His mother, Lenore, was an unsuccessful U.S. Senate candidate in 1970. Romney married his high school sweetheart, Ann Davies, in 1968. They have five sons, Tagg, Matt, Josh, Ben and Craig and ten grandchildren. Ann Romney was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1998.

Romney grew up Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, along with his three siblings, Lynn, Jane and G. Scott. After attending Stanford University for two semesters, Romney took a leave from school to serve a 30-month mission in France as an LDS missionary.

When he returned to the states, he transferred to Brigham Young University, where he graduated summa cum laude in 1971. In 1975, he graduated from a joint JD/MBA program between Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School.

Born: March 12, 1947
Died: –
Famous For: Republican candidate in 2008 presidential election. As governor of Massachusetts, he achieved a balanced budget every year.

Key Accomplishments: Top graduate at Brigham Young University, Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School.

Significant Quote: “It’s time for innovation and transformation in Washington. It’s what our country needs. It’s what our people deserve.” (announcing his candidacy for President)

Fun Quote: “No, I represent the people. You represent the media. You’re supposed to be unbiased.”

After college, Romney spent some time working for the Boston Consulting Group before becoming a vice president at Bain & Company, another Boston-based management consulting firm. In 1984, he left the company to co-found Bain Capital, which soon grew into a highly successful private equity investment firm.

In 1990, Romney was asked to return to Bain & Company, which was facing financial collapse. Within one year, he led Bain & Company through a highly successful turnaround and returned the firm to profitability. After that year, he returned to Bain Capital. During Romney’s time there, the firm founded or invested in companies such as Staples, Brookstone, Domino’s and The Sports Authority. He left Bain Capital in 1998 to head the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympic Games Organizing Committee. In 1999, Romney was hired as the president and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee. He contributed million to the Olympics and donated his 5,000 salary to charity. It was here that Romney first gained national recognition.

In 1994, Romney won the Massachusetts Republican Party’s nomination for U.S. Senate, but Senator Ted Kennedy went on to win the election with 58% of the votes to Romney’s 41%.

In 2002, after a battle over residency requirements, Romney was elected governor of Massachusetts with 50% of the vote over the Democratic candidate. He did not seek re-election. Instead, on January 3, 2007 (just two days before he stepped down as governor), he announced the formation of a presidential exploratory committee. On February 13, 2007, Romney officially announced his presidential candidacy.

As governor of Massachusetts, Romney supported education reform and abortion rights, but has since described himself as pro-life. He supports the death penalty and advocates making health care more affordable.

Romney is one of only a few Mormons, including his father and Orrin Hatch, to run for president.

Special Report: How Washington Took The U.s. to The Brink

(Yes News) -The world’s largest economy was headed toward an unprecedented default, and all Washington wanted to talk about was the manner in which the president had left a room.

A White House meeting in mid-July between President Barack Obama and congressional leaders had ended with sharp words as Obama clashed with the brash Republican House majority leader, Eric Cantor.

Now Cantor was back on Capitol Hill, dishing details to a scrum of reporters — a shift from the terse, vague statements that usually followed such meetings.

“He said to me, ‘Eric, don’t call my bluff. I’m going to the American people with this,’” Cantor said in his Southern drawl. “I was somewhat taken aback.”

Republican aides filled in the gaps. Obama had “stormed out of the room,” one said. At the White House, aides pushed back. One official demonstrated to reporters exactly how Obama had ended the meeting — lightly pushing his chair back from the table, standing up deliberately, walking away calmly. “He didn’t storm out. He just got up and walked into his office,” one said.

That evening — July 13, 2011 — was one of the lowest points in the struggle to avert fiscal disaster and put the nation’s budget on a sustainable path.

Congress needed to extend the country’s .3 trillion debt ceiling before Tuesday, August 2, the date the Treasury Department would begin running out of cash to cover the country’s bills. But Republicans and Democrats were deadlocked.

INSIDERS UNITE

As the deadline drew closer, the two sides abandoned a series of efforts to reach agreement, searching for the right combination of policies and personalities to get a deal done. In the end, it fell to two consummate Washington insiders to prevent the talks from collapsing.

A Reuters examination of the months-long showdown over the debt ceiling found that:

* Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell emerged as critical players in the final stretch of the talks, as theirs was the only cross-party relationship built on decades of trust.

* Despite a belief among many rank-and-file Republicans that the government could muddle through a default, party leaders never doubted the Treasury Department’s warnings that economic catastrophe was a real possibility if they didn’t reach a deal by August 2.

* Although House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, the top U.S. Republican, was eager to strike a bold deal with Obama, it was ultimately necessary for Boehner to distance himself from the White House to convince his House Republicans to back the final deal.

* The business community played an important behind-the-scenes role, with two White House foes — Wall Street and the Chamber of Commerce — rallying support for a compromise backed by Obama.

This account of America’s journey to the brink of default is based on interviews conducted over the past six weeks with dozens of elected officials, business lobbyists and aides in the House, the Senate and the White House.

A ZEAL FOR CUTS

The U.S. congressional elections in November 2010 set the stage for confrontation over the congressionally mandated cap on the outstanding total of federal government borrowings. Republicans had harnessed voters’ anxiety over the economy and soaring deficits to capture the House of Representatives.

Accusing Obama of overreaching with his stimulus package in 2009 and his drive for healthcare reform, Republicans vowed to slash spending and rein in the federal government’s size.

A campaign document — the “Pledge to America” — promised to cut spending by 0 billion in the first year alone, back to the levels in place in Republican President George W. Bush’s last year in office.

The newly elected Republicans, 87 in all, were not interested in compromise. Many felt a greater obligation to the grassroots Tea Party activists who had sent them to Washington than to the party elders who ran the place.

In a budget fight with the Democratic-controlled Senate that took the government to the brink of a shutdown in April, Republicans managed to cut spending by billion, the largest domestic cut in U.S. history.

Still, 59 House Republicans voted against the bill because it did not go far enough.

BOEHNER’S BATTLELINES

That was a mere skirmish. The big battle lay ahead as the government was fast running up against its .3 trillion credit limit and would need Congress to raise it further. In early May, Boehner laid out his conditions for a debt-ceiling increase: spending cuts would need to exceed the amount of new borrowing authority.

Instead of billions of dollars, the debate would be measured in the trillions.

It would be a chance for Boehner to show his new troops that he could use the levers of Washington to get results.

An avid golfer and a chain-smoker, the 61-year-old Boehner is from an older generation than many of the Tea Party conservatives whose election to Congress made it possible for him to become House Speaker.

The seasoned legislator and former businessman grew up in Ohio from a family of modest means and worked as a janitor to help put himself through college.

Obama, 49, had a comfort level with fellow Midwesterner Boehner despite their philosophical differences. The speaker reminded the president, a former state senator from Illinois, of Republican legislators he used to play poker with in Illinois and with whom he forged bipartisan deals.

Both men are even-tempered and view themselves as Washington outsiders. Each has ambitions of transforming Washington and making a big mark on policy.

Those aspirations drove their on-again, off-again talks aimed at a far-reaching, bipartisan “grand bargain” that would put the United States on sounder fiscal footing for years to come.

On a golf outing in mid-June, the two agreed to work together on a broad deficit-reduction deal. “Let’s give it a try,” Obama told the speaker.

The following week, at a secret White House meeting, they agreed to have their staff draw up options. The aim was to craft a plan that would cut deficits by roughly trillion over 10 years.

A ‘GRAND BARGAIN?’

The challenges were steep. Democrats would have to agree to rein in cherished social programs like the Medicare health plan for retirees and the disabled. Republicans would have to accept a tax-code overhaul that would increase revenues through the elimination of tax breaks and deductions.

Boehner’s enthusiasm for the “grand bargain” was not shared by his colleague, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.

McConnell had confided to Vice President Joe Biden that he thought it was unrealistic to try to accomplish such a sweeping deal in the weeks before August 2 deadline.

The Senate Republican leader worried it would lead to a dead end when pressure was building to resolve the debt-limit standoff. Rating agencies were warning they might downgrade the country’s top-notch credit score and, while there was no sign of panic yet in financial markets, investors were growing nervous.

McConnell, 69, had served in the Senate since 1985 and witnessed firsthand the divided-government battles of the 1990s, when Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich and an earlier generation of firebrand conservatives went toe-to-toe with Democratic President Bill Clinton.

MEMORIES OF 1996

That confrontation led to a shutdown of the federal government and provoked a public backlash against Gingrich and his party. With the Republican brand tarnished, Clinton sailed to re-election in 1996.

McConnell, whose party is a minority in the closely divided Senate, viewed the 2012 elections as a chance to gain dominance in the chamber.

He feared the debt-limit fight would put that in jeopardy while also bolstering Obama’s re-election prospects.

If Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s warnings were right — and both McConnell and Boehner believed they were despite skepticism among their rank-and-file — the fallout from a debt default would be calamitous, causing stocks and the dollar to sink and interest rates to surge.

Mortgage rates and business borrowing costs would spike, potentially sending the economy into another recession. That would mean Republicans — whom Democrats had accused of intransigence over the debt limit — would share in the blame for the economy’s woes and suffer voter wrath as a result.

Many in the White House viewed McConnell as more of a tactician than a visionary and someone more focused on party politics than on setting policy. In the quest for a grand bargain, Boehner would make a better partner, they thought.

But in the end, after Boehner twice broke off talks with the White House, administration officials relied heavily on McConnell as an emissary to the speaker, and came to view him as a crucial player.

A BOND BETWEEN RIVALS

The administration’s chief link to McConnell was Biden, 68, a 36-year veteran of the Senate with rock-solid Democratic credentials who nonetheless had a strong rapport with the Republican leader.

The two seemed to speak the same language from their years in the Senate together. Their bond grew closer when they worked together on a tax-cutting deal just before Christmas late last year, according to people who know both men.

“C’mon Mitch, you know what I’m dealing with here,” Biden would sometimes tell McConnell — Senate-speak to describe the pushback he would face from Democratic Party activists if he gave too much ground.

According to a former Biden aide, McConnell seemed to appreciate that Biden understood the GOP leader faced similar constraints within the Republican Party.

In April, Obama tapped Biden to lead a panel of lawmakers that would lay the groundwork for a deal. In an ornate corner room just off the Senate floor, the group pored through stacks of government and private-sector reports to identify more than trillion in mutually acceptable spending cuts.

As the talks stretched into June, Biden gradually built up a rapport with Cantor, the House majority leader, who was leading the Republican side.

REPUBLICAN RIFT

In less than 10 years in Washington, Cantor had quickly climbed to the top rungs of Republican leadership. But his sharp elbows had earned him enemies — some from within his own party.

He and Boehner had a cool relationship, say people who know both lawmakers. The rift extended into the lobbying community, where Republicans identified themselves as “Boehner people” or “Cantor people.”

At the end of June, Cantor abruptly walked out of the Biden talks, saying the two sides could not agree on taxes. The “principals” — Obama and Boehner — would have to take it from there.

Even before the Biden talks began, members of Boehner’s office dismissed them as political theater.

“This thing will ultimately get decided by Boehner and Obama,” a Boehner aide said.

After weeks of back-channel negotiations with Obama, Boehner decided on July 22 that he could not work with the White House and would have to forge a deal with Democrats on Capitol Hill.

The two sides had come tantalizingly close to a deal, but stumbled again over the tax question.

Boehner felt the White House had shifted the goalposts at the last minute.

White House officials believed Boehner’s departure stemmed from an unwillingness — or an inability — to take on the conservative rebels in his party. If Boehner had been willing to shake hands publicly with Obama on a “grand bargain,” they said, there would have been a way to woo enough mainstream Republicans and Democrats to pass the bill.

They also disagreed with any suggestions that they had shifted the goalposts.

‘A BOWL OF JELL-O’

“Dealing with the White House is like dealing with a bowl of Jell-O,” Boehner said angrily at a press conference that night.

Obama called him back to the White House the following day and told him he should not be left out of the process.

“Mr. President, as I read the Constitution, the Congress writes the laws. You get to decide if you want to sign them,” Boehner responded, according to his aides.

The action moved back to Congress. Like the deal that Boehner and the White House had abandoned, the latest plan would separate the relatively easy decisions — curbs on annual discretionary spending — from the difficult reforms to benefits and the tax code.

It wasn’t the “grand bargain” Obama and Boehner had sought, but it would deliver trillions in savings and cover the nation’s borrowing needs past the November 2012 elections.

There was one catch. The plan would require another debt-ceiling vote in a few months to ensure Congress would sign off on the second set of savings, and Obama had already ruled that out.

Around 10 p.m., on Saturday, July 23, Obama called Boehner to tell him he would veto the bill if it reached his desk. But he suggested that they could find another way to ensure Congress would actually follow through with the tax and benefit changes envisioned by the plan.

GOING SEPARATE WAYS

Congressional staff continued work on the plan the next day. Boehner told Fox News he would press ahead with his own legislation if the two sides could not agree. With no progress made on the enforcement mechanism, known as a “trigger” in Washington-speak, that appeared to be the case.

Boehner told Republicans he would unveil his version of the plan on Monday, July 25, while the Democratic leader of the Senate, Harry Reid, decided to advance a rival plan. Another effort had failed.

The final week would put Boehner’s leadership to the test.

Boehner unveiled his plan to Republicans that Monday in a meeting room in the bowels of the Capitol. It wouldn’t tie a debt-limit increase to the balanced-budget constitutional amendment, as many of them wanted, but it would deliver more than trillion in savings. A vote was set for Wednesday, July 27.

Boehner launched a two-front lobbying blitz, alternating between in-person meetings with wavering lawmakers and phone calls to conservative media figures like talk radio host Rush Limbaugh and columnist Charles Krauthammer.

On Monday night, he touted the plan directly to a national audience, as television networks granted him air time to respond to a prime-time speech by Obama.

‘READY TO DRIVE THE CAR’

Boehner’s rally continued on Tuesday morning at the Capitol Hill Club, a social club for Republicans. Boehner’s lieutenants took the lead. Cantor bluntly acknowledged that “the debt limit sucks.” Kevin McCarthy, the House Republican whip, or lead vote counter, showed a clip from “The Town,” a 2010 movie about bank robbers.

“I need your help,” said a character played by Ben Affleck. “You can never ask me about it later and we’re gonna hurt some people.”

“Whose car are we going to take?” asks another character.

The message: it was time to get the job done, no matter how messy. The film clip appeared to win over at least one convert.

Representative Allen West, an outspoken Tea Party-aligned freshman, stood up and shouted: “I’m ready to drive the car!”

OBAMA’S UNLIKELY ALLIES

But momentum shifted as the day wore on. Outside conservative groups like the Club for Growth and the Heritage Foundation urged a vote against the bill.

At the White House, aides were batting away suggestions that Obama had been sidelined.

“He’s working tirelessly, meeting with his economic team, doing a lot of outreach, exploring all opportunities for compromise,” said senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

Obama worked the phones, talking strategy with Democratic leaders and developing options for the final endgame.

Jarrett, one of the administration’s envoys to the business community, said her phone was ringing off the hook with calls from retailers and other business owners worried about the prospect of another debt-limit fight in December if Obama was forced to accept Boehner’s two-step plan.

The White House was also actively reaching out to the business community to spell out the dire consequences of a default.

The administration found an ally in the Chamber of Commerce, a group traditionally aligned with Republicans, who now urged the party to back the bill.

The financial services industry was also on the same page as the administration on this issue, despite its many skirmishes with the White House during the debate over Wall Street reform in 2010.

JAMMED CIRCUITS

In his public address on Monday night, Obama had implored Americans to intervene directly by calling, emailing or posting messages on Twitter to their lawmakers.

Telephone circuits on Capitol Hill seized up, email messages bounced back and Web sites crashed under the load.

The anxiety at the White House was building.

“It’s fair to say that nobody here had any doubt that this was going to go right up to the line, even as we urged Congress not to take it right up to the line,” one administration official said. “That’s just the way Congress works.”

Still, the path toward a deal was far from clear.

Over at Treasury, Geithner was trying to figure out what to do if Congress failed to reach a deal in time.

Should the government make debt service a top priority to prevent a meltdown on Wall Street? That could delay paychecks to soldiers, benefit checks to retirees, and payments to government contracts, sending ripples through the economy.

Back at the Capitol, Boehner’s troubles mounted.

Representative Jim Jordan, a leader of the Republican Party’s right wing, predicted Boehner wouldn’t get the votes he needed from his own party. Democrats united against his bill.

The Congressional Budget Office, the official scorekeeper, said it would only deliver 0 billion in savings, rather than the .2 trillion it claimed. Late that evening, Boehner decided to rewrite the bill to make sure it complied with the party’s vow to extract spending cuts greater than the size of the debt limit increase. That put off a vote until at least Thursday.

‘FIRE HIM!’

The acrimony spilled into the open Wednesday morning, July 27, in the party’s basement meeting room.

Representative Greg Walden, a Boehner ally, read aloud an email from a Jordan staffer that urged outside conservative groups to convince undecided members to vote against the bill. Many lawmakers in the room viewed the message as a betrayal of the Speaker. As the Jordan staffer stood uncomfortably against a wall, lawmakers chanted, “Fire him! Fire him!”

The usually jovial Boehner turned the screws. “Get your ass in line,” he said. There was laughter, but the message was unmistakable.

As the meeting adjourned, lawmakers predicted the bill would pass. But a large number remained on the fence. Boehner spent the day listening to their concerns — the cuts weren’t big enough, the special committee might raise taxes, the balanced-budget amendment has been watered down.

Thursday morning, July 28: another meeting, another chance to rally the troops over fruit and doughnuts and signs that read “Play like a champion.” Representative Mike Kelly, an alumnus of Notre Dame University, drew upon his school’s storied legacy as he urged members to “put on your helmet, buckle your chin straps, run out onto the field and beat the shit out of your opponent!”

Doubters like Jordan stayed silent. As the meeting adjourned, they told reporters that their opposition had not changed.

With the rewritten bill ready to go, Republican leaders scheduled a vote for late Thursday afternoon. As debate started on the House floor, Boehner, Majority Leader Cantor and Whip McCarthy continued to meet with doubters, making the case that the party needed to stick together if it wanted an acceptable final product.

At 5:25 p.m., the Republican troika abruptly yanked the bill from the House floor with only one minute left of debate. They didn’t have the votes.

‘BLOODY AND BEATEN’

As floor action turned to naming post offices, Boehner summoned the holdouts to his office just off the Capitol rotunda. Whatever he was doing wasn’t changing any minds.

“I’m a bloodied and beaten ‘no,’” said Representative Louie Gohmert of Texas, one of several conservatives who had downplayed the consequences of a technical default, as he left the office.

At the beginning of the year, Republicans had enacted a ban on earmarks, the pet spending projects that had come to symbolize waste and corruption in the public imagination. That meant that Boehner had fewer carrots to offer reluctant members — no highway overpasses.

“It is the most refreshing thing in the world to see what is going on here. These kinds of negotiations a couple of years ago would have cost billion,” said Representative Jeff Flake of Arizona, whose anti-spending stance had made him an outcast in the party in the past decade.

The five Republicans who represent South Carolina headed from Boehner’s opulent suite to the Capitol’s small, private chapel to pray.

As they knelt beneath a stained glass window depicting George Washington, they weren’t praying for guidance, just strength to maintain their stand.

“I think divine inspiration has already happened. I was a ‘lean-no,’ now I’m a ‘no,’” said Representative Tim Scott.

19 BOXES OF PIZZA

The action moved downstairs to McCarthy’s office. The jovial 46-year-old Republican whip, from California’s dusty interior, was a novice vote counter. He had presided over a few embarrassing setbacks earlier in the year. Now he was facing a true disaster.

As the night wore on, 19 boxes of pizza from Al’s Pizzeria disappeared into McCarthy’s office.

The holdouts weren’t looking for pork-barrel spending or other favors — though they didn’t refuse the pizza. Instead, they wanted to strengthen the balanced-budget clause. That would certainly doom the bill in the Senate, but at that point Boehner just wanted to get it out of the House.

Even with that change, Boehner still appeared to be short of the 217 votes he needed. At 10:30 on Thursday night, the House adjourned without a vote.

House Republicans met in their basement clubhouse again on Friday morning, July 29. The holdouts came under more pressure — this time from other rank-and-file members who said they were undermining the party’s negotiating position. But a final count showed that the votes appeared to be there.

“I love you guys,” Boehner said in a moment of levity.

The bill passed Friday evening on a vote of 218 to 210 — just one vote more than needed. The Senate defeated it two hours later, and the House retaliated on Saturday by defeating a proposal put forth by Harry Reid, leader of the Democratic majority in the Senate.

Another week had elapsed, and Congress was no closer to consensus.

While the legislative chess game played out, Biden called McConnell on Wednesday and Friday.

MCCONNELL’S BOTTOM LINE

Out of loyalty to Boehner, the Senate Republican leader had refrained from talks with the White House for most of the week.

On Friday morning, McConnell told Biden there was “no daylight” between the two Republicans, but told the vice president to try later in the day.

“Call me back after these votes and I will tell you what it will take to get my support,” McConnell said, according to a Republican aide.

Biden and McConnell spoke again Friday evening and in the early afternoon on Saturday. Negotiations began in earnest around 3 p.m., after the House defeated Reid’s bill.

Tuesday, August 2, was three days away.

White House chief of staff Bill Daley’s office became Grand Central Station for a rolling series of meetings among White House staff. The meetings moved on Sunday to the vice president’s office and later to the Oval Office.

On Saturday, Obama asked Biden’s chief of staff, Bruce Reed, whether his wife was angry that he was spending his wedding anniversary at the office.

“Previously, I was on negative watch but I’ve now been officially downgraded,” Reed deadpanned.

CLIMACTIC PHONE CALLS

After months of high-profile meetings, nearly all of the negotiations on the final weekend took place by phone.

In the big gatherings, participants tended to emphasize “talking points” because of the expectation that the conversations would spill out into the public. Smaller meetings allowed participants to cut to the chase, according to an administration official, and details could remain private.

On Saturday night, a media report surfaced that there was a tentative framework for a deal.

White House reporters seeking an update chased a top communications aide toward the Oval Office, only to be told later that the two sides had not arrived at a deal yet.

Indeed, the negotiations ended up going down to the wire.

At 5 p.m. on Sunday night, White House officials discussed whether Treasury Secretary Geithner should make a statement to the financial markets that evening or perhaps the following morning.

GEITHNER’S GAME

Geithner, in his former role as head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was one of the chief financial firefighters during the global markets meltdown triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008.

Asian markets were about to open. The crisis had already roiled U.S. debt markets and taken a toll on the dollar and Wall Street stocks.

Administration officials feared worse bloodletting if investors returned to their desks at the start of the week without clarity on whether there would be a deal.

Geithner and a small team of aides had been quietly working on contingency plans in case Congress missed the August 2 deadline to raise the debt ceiling. Treasury had planned to brief markets on those plans no later than Monday.

Private-sector analysts believed that in a worst-case scenario, Geithner would be prepared to tell markets he would put a priority on paying the government’s debt in order to avoid default — even if that meant taking the politically explosive step of delaying payments to Social Security recipients and others.

PULLING THE TRIGGER

But the Treasury secretary never had to show his hand.

The final sticking point in the talks centered on the terms of the deficit-cutting “trigger.” Democrats wanted automatic cuts in military spending if Congress balked at the second round of deficit reduction.

Biden and McConnell spoke four times on Saturday, five times on Sunday, circling around the two stumbling blocks that remained — the nature of the “trigger” and the size of the defense cuts that Democrats wanted. McConnell kept in contact with Boehner.

On Sunday, July 31, there were less than two full days before Default Day. As Obama’s budget director, Jack Lew, crunched numbers on the Republican defense cut proposals, the White House feared it might not get a deal. Biden spoke with Boehner around 4 p.m. and said, “We just can’t get there.”

McConnell floated a compromise to widen the trigger to all security-related programs — the State Department, veterans’ care, nuclear security — and not just the Pentagon.

At 8:15 p.m. Sunday, Obama made a final call to Boehner as White House aides listened nearby.

“Do we have a deal?” Obama asked.

There was a moment of suspense, then: “Congratulations to you, too, John.”

Mitt Romney for 2012 President Race

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney officially became the second major Republican to be the GOP nominee in the 2012 presidential race in June 2011. To achieve his aim of winning White House bid, Mitt Romney is trying his best to show off her talented ability, knowledge and good minds. The 2012 presidential candidate announced a challenge to President Barack Obama in 2012 with his declaration that he would “put America back on a course of greatness.” Moreover, his announcement focused mainly on the troubled American economy and said he had “become convinced that America has been put on a dangerous course by Washington politicians, and it has become even worse during the last two years.”

Romney who was born in Michigan in 1947 is the son of George W. Romney, the former Governor of Michigan and Lenore Romney. He was ever a student of Brigham Young University. Romney joined the management consulting business, helping him reach a position at Bain & Company, eventually serving as its CEO to lead it out of crisis. Mitt Romney married his wife, Ann Romney in 1969 after years of dating out. The couple first met in elementary school when Mitt was a Cub Scout. Ann was riding a horse and Mitt Romney threw stones at her. They have a large family with five children: Taggart, Matthew, Joshua, Benjamin and Craig.

The former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has been a GOP nominee in the 2012 presidential campaign 

 

Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney blamed the U.S. government’s credit downgrade squarely on President Obama on Monday August 8. According to Mitt Romney, downgrade by ratings agency Standard & Poor’s, which has sparked a sharp drop in global financial markets, “punctuated once again the failure of leadership by the president.”

Mitt Romney governor declared: “Barack Obama has failed America.”

Mitt Romney spoke on Thursday August 11 in Iowa: ‘Corporations Are People’ as hecklers asked for raising taxes on large businesses

Ahead of his expected 2012 presidential bid, Mitt Romney has tried to appear more like an everyday guy rather than 2012 presidential candidate in skinny jeans

Ann Romney, Mitt Romney’s wife

Mitt Romney with his wife announced his bid for the US presidency at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan

Mitt Romney with his wife Ann prompted his bid for the Republican presidential nomination in Stratham

The Romney couple in New Hampshire

Romney’s happy family

First son Tagg Romney and Governor Mitt Romney at their lake house on April 15, 2007 to celebrate Ann Romney’s 58th birthday

 

Mitt Romney for the 2012 President Race

 

Related links:

Mitt Romney Suspends Bid for President

The 2012 GOP Presidential Race Has Begun

Rick Perry for President Running 2012

Mitt Romney Suspends Bid for President

Republican Mitt Romney, who was putting up a brave front to Senator John McCain’s performance in the primaries, has finally decided to suspend his presidential campaign. The reason, he said, was that he did not want the democrats to win.

According to Romney, his decision to quit arose from noble sentiments. The former Massachusetts governor expressed concern that his continuing campaign could prevent a national campaign, and make it easier for Democrats Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to win. “In this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror,” he said, adding, “This is not an easy decision. I hate to lose.”

Of late, McCain’s nomination has seemed a very likely eventuality. At the Super Tuesday contests, Romney had scored a dismal 286 delegates, as compared to McCain’s score of 697 delegates.

Now, with Romney out of his way, the senior senator’s position as the GOP nominee for president seems almost a matter of time.

Speaking at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, in Washington, where he announced his decision, Romney said, “If this were only about me, I’d go on. But it’s never been only about me. I entered this race because I love America, and because I love America, in this time of war I feel I have to now stand aside for our party and for our country.”

Romney said he disagreed with McCain on many key issues. However, he said, “But I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq, on finding and executing Osama bin Laden, and I agree with him on eliminating al Qaeda and terror worldwide.” According to a McCain aide, McCain called up Romney to say that he admired him and thought that he was a tough competitor.

Romney, who served a term as the governor of Massachusetts, decided to enter the race for president in 2007. The former investment banker ran his campaign on the strength of his perceived financial expertise. However, his candidature suffered from his frequent flip flops on issues such as abortion. Besides, his Mormon faith also drew considerable amount of attention.

Romney, who had funded a large part of his campaign from his personal resources, had come first in the Super Tuesday contests, from Alaska, Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Utah. He also won from Maine, Michigan, Nevada, and Wyoming in the early voting contests. Mike Huckabee, who won the Iowa caucuses, seemed to be Romney’s most potential rival for the party’s conservative vote. He won Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Tennessee, and West Virginia in the Super Tuesday contests.

 

Are Conservative American Voters Hopeless?

During late June, Fox News released the results of a poll.

Republican Primary voters told pollsters whom they hoped would become the 2012 Republican presidential nominee.

Here are the top results:

1) Mitt Romney with 18%
2) Rick Perry with 13%
3) Michele Bachmann with 11%
4) Rudy Giuliani with 10%
5) Sarah Palin with 8%
6) Ron Paul with 7%
7) Herman Cain with 5%
8) Tim Pawlenty with 3%
9) New Gingrich with 3%

The top five are all long established candidates.  The top five!

Why aren’t candidates outside the establishment faring better?

Aren’t voters supposed to be fed up with government corruption?  Weren’t there hundreds of thousands of protesters who protested against Obama, big government and corruption?  Wasn’t there a massive protest in September 2009, one with a crowd estimated to be as high as one million plus?

Aren’t the approval ratings of Congress running about twenty percent?

Wouldn’t you think people would be dying to see a fresh face, or someone who speaks candidly and rationally?

Let’s see how the less political than typical candidates fare in the poll:

1)  Herman Cain received only 5% of the vote:  Although Cain has been involved in politics over the years,  it’s my impression that he likely hasn’t been entrenched deeply enough to suggest he’s become corrupt.  My contention is bolstered by the fact that he has certainly done things atypical of a corruption politician, such as speaking candidly about Muslims.  In addition, he’s the former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza.

Couldn’t the presidency use a candid, logical outsider who is a businessman, rather than a lawyer?

2)  Ron Paul received only 5% of the vote:  Although Paul is a long time member of government, he certainly doesn’t seem to be very, if at all, corrupt.  He often speaks candidly and says things you won’t hear from other politicians.  One example of this is his criticism of the Federal Reserve.

Shouldn’t he be one of the leaders in the poll?  It’s interesting to note that he, like Cain, is not a lawyer.  He’s a doctor.

3)  Newt Gingrich received only 3%:  Although he was a long time politician, he certainly doesn’t seem to me to be as corrupt as most politicians.  Doesn’t anyone remember the success of his Contract With America?  Doesn’t anyone remember that America returned to a budget surplus while he was Speaker of the House?  If you’re going to choose a member of the establishment, why not him?

Weren’t all those conservative protests begging that the country get its finances in order?  Why is a person with such a track record being selected by only 3% of respondents?  It’s a disgrace!

Conclusion

Do conservative Americans really want change?

If they do, the country is certainly in trouble, judging by their inability to identify and/or choose change!

This one poll is enough to make me think that Americans might as well just give up right now!  Don’t complain and protest unless you do your part and become knowledgeable enough to do something about it!

The Republican Primary Debates Through The Eyes Of An Atheist

In the United States of America you have to search really hard to find politicians who can successfully win a campaign without having a religious affiliation on their resume.  Pete Stark (D-CA) became the first openly atheist U.S. Congressman when he made his convictions known in 2007, but one congressman from California’s stanchly liberal 13th district falls flat of giving the atheist community proportional representation in Congress. American religious demographics aren’t likely to be progressive enough to allow for an atheist to lead the country such as Australia’s Prime Minister Julian Gillard for a long time, especially in an atmosphere where the current president is repeatedly accused in ignorant circles as secretly possibly being a Muslim as if that were a horrible thing to be.

With atheists all over America cringing at the religious statements being made by Republican candidates in the first of the recent Republican Presidential Debates, this is a good chance to highlight exactly what turns off atheist voters in terms of intolerance and bigotry displayed in the people who might make it to the 2012 ballot.

On same sex marriage:

-          Ron Paul said,” The federal government shouldn’t be involved. I wouldn’t support an amendment. But let me suggest — one of the ways to solve this ongoing debate about marriage, look up in the dictionary. We know what marriage is all about. But then, get the government out of it. Why doesn’t it go to the church? And why doesn’t it to go to the individuals? I don’t think government should give us a license to get married. It should be in the church.” (CNN.com)

As an atheist I have to wonder why my ability to marry someone should be determined by a church. If some of the more fundamentalist ministers in America had their way, Atheism might be just as much of a marriage no-no as homosexuality, open marriages, or living together before marriage. Also, why not include mosques, synagogues, Wiccan covens, and satanic temples in the conversation instead of just the majority religion?

On the separation of church and state:

-          Tim Pawlenty said,” Well, the protections between the separation of church and state were designed to protect people of faith from government, not government from people of faith. This is a country that in our founding documents says we’re a nation that’s founded under God, and the privileges and blessings at that we have are from our creator. They’re not from our member of Congress. They’re not from our county commissioner.” (CNN.com)

I disagree with Governor Pawlenty’s stance because if government isn’t protected from the influence of religion it is the minority religions (along with atheists) that run the very real risk of being oppressed by the social values of the dominant religious institutions of the country.  The separation of church and state protects minority religious positions from discrimination by limiting the ability for majority religions to control government policies.

Also including a respect for the use of faith in leadership and decision making when asked about the separation of church and state were Rick Santorum and Ron Paul. For most atheists this is not the kind of quality we are looking for when we vote. Quickly following this was Herman Cain’s backpedaling and clarifications on why he said he’d feel uncomfortable with a Muslim in his cabinet in a previous interview, along with Newt Gingrich stoking the fires of Islamophobia with a story about a failed car bomber who told a judge he lied when he swore an oath to the United States during naturalization. The cheers from the crowd as Gingrich spun the fear of people infiltrating the government with anti-U.S. sentiments were chilling to me as I realized that the one group the American Christian majority is afraid of more than Muslims is atheists, and we could be next on the menu for the fear mongering tour.

Marriage Map Michele Weiner Davis

We have been helping married couples discover a more exciting and intimate relationship for over 15 years, and we have been married close to 20 years ourselves.Grab A Copy Click here

We have spoken at marriage seminars, taught small groups, and coached many couples one on one. And trust us, we’ve seen it all.

But more importantly, we have been able to help husbands and wives learn to be best friends again. And we want to do the same for you.

We also want you to know that if you are feeling emotionally distant from your husband, you are not alone.

Millions of wives grew up dreaming of a romantic wedding, followed by years of happiness spent with their best friend.

And though it may have started well, most wives today suffer the acute pain of feeling ignored by the man they fell in love with.

We have seen the same scene repeat itself over and over again.

Most couples begin their marriage with high hopes and at least a descent friendship.

But after months (or years) of hurtful misunderstandings, the wife typically ends up suffering from loneliness, pain, and frustration.

Does your husband seem to care about many other things more than you? His hobbies, his work, his friends? Does he seem to be spending more and more time away from you?Grab A Copy Click here
In our over 15 years of helping other marriages, we have seen very few marriages escape this rut.

Why is that?

Most couples are not taught how to be married, and marriage can be very challenging. With MarriageMap, we not only teach you critical core strategies, we also walk with you step-by-step as your marriage literally transforms before your very eyes.

We can absolutely help you to feel close to, and to feel cherished by, your husband like perhaps you never have before.

We sincerely hope you will take the time to consider our MarriageMap Program. It can be life-changing if you allow it to be.

We developed the MarriageMap program to teach you how to get your husband to long to be with you … starting literally in less than forty-eight hours.

That means he’ll start to pay more attention to you in just a couple of days!

Every 10 days, for 3 straight months, you’ll receive an email with a special download link for your step-by-step lesson. Included in the lesson is an assignment for you to complete so you’ll make continuous progress.

In addition, we’ll also send you mini-assignment every few days. These action items are not just busywork, but rather super-powerful strategies to draw your husband to you like a magnet tugging on a piece of steel.

And we don’t just ‘hand you homework’, but rather we provide you with an insider’s glimpse of the mind of a man, so you can fully understand why these strategies work so magically.

Grab A Copy Click here

 

Change Yes, Ron Paul No

Ron Paul’s obnoxious supporters like more traditional political activists can spin and delude themselves about election results. But the Iowa caucus results could not be clearer: The vast national desire for political change is manifesting itself through support for both Democratic and Republican change-candidates. Despite Paul being flush with money and having a large number of workers in Iowa, he was solidly rejected as the leading change agent.

Even with a huge historic turnout of about 348,000 participants, Paul did not attract significant numbers of independents that could easily participate in the Republican caucuses. They went to Obama, Edwards and Huckabee.

On the Democratic side, of some 232,000 people that turned out for the caucuses, nearly doubling what it was four years ago, about 70 percent wanted change and went for Obama and Edwards, roughly 150,000 participants.

On the Republican side, of the 116,000 participants, about 40,000 change-voters went for Huckabee, compared to 11,600 that chose Paul, giving him fifth place.

That 10 percent for Paul was very close to the 9 percent found in a Des Moines Register poll of likely caucus voters (margin of error 3.5 points). Interestingly, like Paul, Huckabee also wants to eliminate the federal income tax.

In both parties, change-voters totaled about 200,000. So Paul received just 6 percent of that large fraction, and just 3 percent of the total of all caucus participants in Iowa. Paul was first in only one county, Jefferson, with 36 percent

Edwards was absolutely correct when he summed things up this way: “The one thing that is clear from the results in Iowa tonight is the status quo lost and change won.”

With all the hoopla from Paul supporters about younger people being for Paul, that’s not what the Iowa results showed.

Younger people seeking change and inspiration flocked to Obama, in particular. There was no demographic in Iowa that overwhelmingly went for Paul. Sure, Paul beat Giuliani, but Paul’s effort in Iowa was much bigger than Giuliani’s.

None of these results will impact Paul’s supporters nationwide. Earl Ofari Hutchinson wrote a great article on Alternet.org: “Ron Paul is Scary, But Those Who Cheer Him Are Even Scarier.” He was right when he said: “The scariest thing about GOP presidential contender Ron Paul is not his fringe, odd-ball racial views. It is that people take him seriously.” But now Iowa has thankfully shown that the vast majority of Americans, especially those seeking political change, reject Paul.

After losing badly in Iowa Paul said: “The other candidates talk about tinkering with the status quo. We don’t want to tinker; we want to change the status quo.” He said that his campaign is on the upswing and gaining support among independents, frustrated Republicans and unhappy Democrats. Just one very big problem: The Iowa results show that all these people are much more likely to vote for other Democratic and Republican change-candidates.

Paul’s supporters claim that he will do much better in New Hampshire where Libertarian Party members hold a number of offices. I don’t think so. Several polls taken before the Iowa results found Paul at just 5 to 9 percent. Will Paul get a big boost from Iowa? I don’t think so. Paul had predicted he could finish in third place in Iowa, and many of his supporters think he will do that in New Hampshire. I don’t think so. Paul will likely finish fifth in New Hampshire, in large part because more independents will go to Obama and McCain.

When Paul first ran for president as the Libertarian Party candidate in 1988, he won just 0.54 percent of the vote. Iowa shows that his second presidential bid will not produce much better results. Paul is definitely not tapping in a major way into the national populist movement, major desire for political change, anti-status quo sentiment, or even the anti-Iraq war issue. Clearly, other Democratic and Republican change-candidates are doing much better. This reality will not affect Paul’s passionate, cult-like followers that are solidified like cement in their belief that Paul can and should be our next president, something that Paul himself probably never really believed.